Zwanziger wanted to initiate a debate on the allocation of World Cup 2022 in Qatar, presented the chamber presided over by Judge Joachim Matz at the oral negotiating firmly in their legal classification on Tuesday. Zwanziger statement in an interview with the Hessian Radio from June 2, 2015 was “from the standpoint of freedom of expression nor justified”.
The freedom of expression is higher classified as the “Ehrschutz” the Qatari Football Association QFA, who had sued for an injunction. Zwanziger, who appeared in person in the room 1120 of the District Court had argued to have not personally spoken to a group, but criticized a system.
Emotional slugfest
In the opinions of both parties – the QFA was represented by the CSU politician Peter Gauweiler – relaxing a be slugfest of heavyweights, Zwanziger was emotional. Gauweiler alleged that the defendant had acted ehrabschneiderisch and virulent – a personal motivation: He shouts “Stop thief!”, But was itself close to a structure that “the full of dirt” did. Taunts about Zwanziger role in the World Cup affair Henceforth exchanged -. A subject which the court had previously explicitly excluded
“The inclusion of the 2006 World Cup is absolutely false,” Zwanziger said in direction Gauweiler and was louder: “Because slurs are made without knowing the facts Some of their assertions are underground.” Gauweiler had the statement Zwanziger, he had until 2012 to know the extent of the failings in the World Cup affair, as “confession” counted, “that he knew about everything in detail since the communication”. This should underpin the view of the QFA, Twenties throw in a glass house with stones.
Gauweiler brings court to ponder – Zwanziger peak direction Netzer
Gauweiler brought the court also scratching their heads when he entered on Zwanziger statement with Qatar had “everything started”. This is a deliberately false statement of fact. Zwanziger has “want to blur own tracks” in the face of the suspect WM-award of 2006. The presiding judge then Matz: “The argument is good, we think again about it.” After SID information Gauweiler will challenge the ruling in the case of a negative outcome and go through the courts
Zwanziger was confident of victory after the trial -. And even sent a tip direction Günter Netzer, whose lawsuit against the 70- olds will be negotiated in eight days in Cologne. “As I have always told the truth, I have since not afraid,” said Zwanziger: “Until the date is still a lot have happened since they can securely.” Netzer wants to prohibit Zwanziger in court the claim that he had the former DFB president 2012 reported in Zurich by a vote-buying for the 2006 World Cup.
The Frankfurt office is investigating Zwanziger also on suspicion of tax evasion in a particularly severe case. The retired judge will in the coming months, so still have to appear several times in court – or want to.
Zwanziger announces lawsuit against ARD – stations are located left
In Dusseldorf he announced that is still a lawsuit against the ARD on. The 70-year-old finds himself injured by an allegedly false statement of fact in the “Tagesschau”. “You do not think that I will like me that six million viewers is alleged that I had deceived the Supervisory Board of the OC 2006,” Zwanziger said Tuesday. The ARD report will have “a sequel”: “You have raised suspicions in the rank of a fact this she must be judged..” To date, no legal steps have yet been taken.
When you see the ARD action announcement with equanimity. “I can not imagine that an action of success would be crowned me. I would advise Mr. Zwanziger, not everything to sue around him,” sporting director Axel Balkausky told the SID. “Our lyrics are all removed, we work as a journalist very carefully.”
dpa / sid
No comments:
Post a Comment