DFB president Wolfgang Niersbach tried to explain the cash flow before the 2006 World Cup. But his story sounds like crime and organized crime.
In Sicily there is a saying:” Chi gioca solo, non perde “. Who is playing alone, does not lose.
If the unlikely-sounding story of ten million francs is true, the DFB president Wolfgang Niersbach told on Thursday, then FIFA has played a very dirty game. The world football body would act as a racketeer. You have to pay him ten million, so that one later gets 250 million?
But the association would not have been acting alone, but the organizing committee (OC) of the 2006 World Cup would indirectly and with other people’s money to an organization full Corrupt paid many millions, for anything. The abbreviation “OK” is incidentally also known at policemen. For them it is “organized crime”.
What crime was committed?
With righteousness, this operation would have nothing to do. If it was so, as alleged by Niersbach, the books were manipulated and deceived the supervisory bodies. It is not the question of whether a crime was committed, but only that: Infidelity? Amounted to? The other questions are the usual: Who takes responsibility, who goes, who is allowed to stay? It is not easy to keep track of this autumn fairy tales.
Full vigorously denies the DFB President that the World Cup had been bought with the money. Payment of Robert Louis-Dreyfus, the former Adidas chief and sinister helper was, indeed carried out in 2002 – and not in 2000, at the time of the World Cup award, such as the Mirror had claimed. The money has gone to the FIFA and not to the OC or the DFB.
Dubious payments million-trafficking before the World Cup 2006 brings DFB in need
Association chief Wolfgang Niersbach can not explain why 6.7 million euros were paid to the Fifa without informing the Supervisory Board about the purpose. The Fifa is at a distance.
You will need to wait and see if still emerge receipts for the year 2000th And you know in the world of corruption also thank donations. The Fifa-makers can not be excluded that they regulate important matters in such a way. Yes, you can ask, even if the old story with the buying of votes, with the slush fund in 2000 that it allegedly did not exist -. If this story would not have been any nicer than the now presented by Niersbach
Fans prefer to think of the wonderful time
They at least could understand easily. 6.7 million euros for such a beautiful World Cup – that would be a lot of people still have been more employable than this dirty story from the backrooms. Almost every WM has evidently bought, then why in God’s name is not even that of the Germans? Anyway the audience retains the beautiful events like in memory.
All of this is also great theater. Last weekend was the prologue, the epilogue will follow. On Thursday, the interlude took place. “Meyers Large Taschenlexikon” sees this as the purpose “of content, variety or bridging technically related breaks, as the scenes and costume change”. As a “comic insert to fill a drama” are interludes also defined. They should distract the audience from the fact that precisely the scene is changed. And who plays with Fifa,
WM-Award 2018 and 2022 – Beckenbauer can hope for lenient sentence
No comments:
Post a Comment